Basically a historical fiction with legal connotations, "Bridging
Souls -A Journey From Mahabharata to Bharata", authored by Shri Arindam
Nath,a senior Police Officer has earned rave reviews from different corners.
Even critical acclaims too. It was an experience of sorts when I was going
through it. History.......Crime....Contemporaneity .........Nostalgia......all
meandering, all permeating !!! Delicate issues like Maoist Movement, Gorkha
Land agitation & activities of PWG have been delineated in a lucid and
comprehensive manner. A vibrant attempt has been made to analyze & decipher
the nuances of legal aspects of innumerable heinous crime committed in the
historic era through the scanner of prevailing provisions. A cerebral and
nonconformist interpretation of Mahabharata makes the book, in the form of
travelogue, more engrossing. The writer's honest endeavour through the prism of
a police officer as well as a sensitive human being is evident throughout the
journey of reading the book. It was a pleasant journey because sailing was so
smooth !!!!! Enjoyed it out & out.
Sunday, 25 October 2015
Rupak Debanath, Prof. Distance Education, Tripura Central University, Agartala on : Bridging Souls: A Journey from Mahabharata to Bharata
Bridging
Souls: A Journey from Mahabharata to Bharata is a
fascinating narrative bridging the gap between the legends of the past and the
advancement of the present. Nath deftly blends myth, history, and fiction into
a unifying globule. On one hand, the intriguing mysteries of Aman’s death, the
fiancé of Dr Harleen Bedi, prods the readers on; on the other, the saga of the
Mahabharata and of our great historical predecessors are splendidly unified
with the main plot arousing a readerly interest.
The
author’s keen sense of humour lightens the mood of the story that would
otherwise have been sombre and serious. His use of humour and wit is varied and
commendable. In one of several witty anecdotes, he says, “In our school days,
we were fond of translating Bengali names.... It goes like: ‘Surya
Mondal...Solar System,’ Jagat Roy...Universal
Opinion,’ Sushil Nath...Faithful Husband,’ ‘Durjoy Pahari...” (6) etc. He keeps
facts in ‘half-light’ to arouse the readers’ curiosity: “Let us take the case
of Kurukshetra battle; the Kauravas carried 23 tons of eatables as against 2
slabs of PEK with accessoriess carried by the Pandavas” (11). The reader, thus,
is prompted to read through the next few pages to break this jinx of the
Kurukshetra.
The
book also marks the ‘progress’ of the civilization. It unearths many injustices
and crimes that were committed in the past but escaped censure. The killing of
Jarasandha and Sishupala, the author feels, is ‘fraud,’ a ‘violation of human
rights.’ Again, a comparison is drawn between the battle of Kurukshetra and the
cold war between USSR
and USA. The
two opposing forces, Kauravas and the Pandavas, of this battle are equated with
the Warsaw and NATO countries. And
so, Shakuni bears familiarity with the KGB chief and Vidura with the CIA chief.
Although, the comparisons are too far drawn, it nevertheless raises interesting
questions. How far has civilization progressed between the battle of the
Kurukshetra and the murder of Aman? Does modern man surpass the subtlety of
Shukuni? The pride of ‘progress’ may be debatable; but the improvement of Court
Laws is found through the justice meted out to the case of Aman. The Indian
judiciary is not without its follies: injustices occur for the lack of evidence
or for distortion of evidence, and an eternal time is taken to pass judgements.
Judgement, in fact, depends more on the shrewdness of the lawyer than on the
simplicity of facts. However, this narrative upholds that in spite of its
loopholes, the judiciary tries hard to confer justice on the victims.
Improvement
in the legal system is hinted through the implementation of Indian Penal Code
laws like 400 IPC, 435/302/429 IPC and of section 436/302/201/34 IPC. When the
former is associated with a preparation for dacoity, the later is linked with
arson, murder and elopement of evidence and the last with the Wild Life
Protection Act. The first law is linked to Duryadhona’s conspiracy of burning
the Pandavas in the house at Varanabata; the second to the Pandavas plot of
inviting the Nishad family of a mother and five sons. The Pandavas flee but the
family dies with the burning of Varanabata; the third to Arjuna’s burning of
the forest in Khandavprasta. Among other laws, there is reference to 354 IPC
under which men can be arrested for eve teasing or for humiliating women.
Dushasana escaped legal punishment despite humiliating Draupadi; today, men are
easily bailed out for committing such offences. Thus, it is evident that from
the past to the present, rebuking and exploitation of women still
continues. Although, there are many laws under the Indian judicial
system, their effectiveness and their implementation remain debatable. The
society has also become more politicised and corrupted than before. Readers,
who are conventional, perhaps, may be too comfortable with the view of the
Pandavas being guilty rather than beings the victims of the Kauravas’s envy.
The
book is not a retelling of the past. Incidents in the Mahabharata are viewed
from a different dimension. In this reinterpretation, the poetic beauty and the
greatness of epic feats are abandoned. And what ultimately emerges is that India
is yet to become a modal society despite its new laws and a strong judicial
system.
ALAK DASGUPTA. Officer UBI, Agartala and writer on :Bridging Souls: A Journey from Mahabharata to Bharata
A fascinating voyage with you has been ended yesterday
night. The journey was delightful, captivating the heart. The way you
illuminated the past that was nice. This novel successfully reflects the change
of Society, revolution of customs and formalities, holy and unholy, legal
mutation, fair or foul in the mirror of time.
As the story was in a strait track somewhere it failed to maintain the speed. It's my personal observation that the death incident of Captain Amandeep (Suicide or Homicide whatever may be) was not suitable for the story. The cause of Amandeep's death incident was not logically presented here. His father was an army officer,his fiancee a final year student of M.B.B.S and others none of them doubted that a person commuting suicide could not shoot twice on his head!
As the story was in a strait track somewhere it failed to maintain the speed. It's my personal observation that the death incident of Captain Amandeep (Suicide or Homicide whatever may be) was not suitable for the story. The cause of Amandeep's death incident was not logically presented here. His father was an army officer,his fiancee a final year student of M.B.B.S and others none of them doubted that a person commuting suicide could not shoot twice on his head!
The rest of the story
was fine,well styled; specially it was narrated wonderfully about the Maoist
and other insurgency.
Thanks to you for inform us about the nice voyage.My earnest request to you please write a novel on the life-style of local inhabitants in inaccessible area of Tripura.Your vast experience and views will help you very much.
Thanks to you for inform us about the nice voyage.My earnest request to you please write a novel on the life-style of local inhabitants in inaccessible area of Tripura.Your vast experience and views will help you very much.
RAHUL KARMAKAR, Reporter Hindustan Times, Guwahati, Assam on : Bridging Souls: A Journey from Mahabharata to Bharata
Had the Indian Penal Code (IPC) been in force when Veda
Vyas was around, the good guys of Mahabharata would have ended up as bad guys
and vice versa. So says a book by a Tripura police officer.
Assistant inspector general of Tripura Police Arindam Nath’s novelBridging Minds: A Journey from Mahabharata to Bharata might not rate among the classics. But it relates a few turning points in the epic to the IPC and finds that the Kauravas were harmless compared to the crimes committed by the Pandavas.
Nath tells his story through the diary of protagonist Ashamanja Bhowmik, a medical officer who accompanies the Tripura State Rifles (TSR) during a recruitment rally across the places where Mahabharata was set 3,000 years ago. It also refers to tribal interpretations of the epic, particularly the Bhil version that often tweaks the original.
“The Indian epics fascinate me. But I got the idea of juxtaposing theMahabharata events withpresent-day global politics and looking at the epic’s characters through the IPC prism while travelling across northern and central India as chairman of TSR recruitment board in 2008 and interacting with people. Besides, the growing demand for updating the IPC of 1860 vintage made me take it back in time,” Nath saidfrom Tripura capital Agartala.
The IPC, his book says, would have let Dushasan get away with simple punishment for disrobing Draupadi. The vastraharaneventually led to the Kurukshetra war but outraging modesty of a woman is a bailable offence under section 354 of IPC, Nath’s book contends.
The book finds the infallible Bhishma guilty of abducting three sisters – Amba, Ambika and Ambalika – and forcing them into a bigamous marriage with stepbrother Vichitravirya. Another offence for creating a situation for Amba to commit suicide would have translated into a life sentence.
Guru Dronacharya too would have faced the music under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and section 326 of IPC for forcing a minor tribal boy (Eklavya) to sever his thumb, the book contends while marking the Pandavas as bigger offenders.
In the Jatugriha (house of wax) episode, for instance, they violated sections pertaining to arson, luring a backward Nishad family to die in their place and destroying evidence by killing Duryodhana’s accomplice Purochana. Burning down the Khandavprasta forest too invited death sentence.
Nath infers the Pandavas might have inherited the criminal streak from mother Kunti who would have been jailed for 10 years for violating section 317 IPC by deserting infant Karna.
“In comparison, the Kauravas are offenders of minor crimes such as cattle lifting,” Nath says, arguing that Vidura’s propaganda made the Pandavas more virtuous than they were. “Why then did 59 tribes side with the Kauravas while 38 were with the Pandavas?”
————————————-
Mahabharata protagonists and IPC sections they would have been booked under
Pandavas: Sections 436 (arson), 302 (mass murder of Nishad family with identical composition to died in their place), 201 (hiding/destroying evidence) and 120-B (conspiracy)
Pandavas: Sections 435/436/302/429 for setting Khandavprastha on fire to build their capital, killing thousands of tribes living in that forest, destroying dwellings, crop and flora and fauna
Surya: Section 376 for ‘raping’ Kunti who did not want a child by him
Kunti: Section 317 for deserting child (Karna by Surya) under 12 and exposing him to danger
Bhishma: Sections 366/494 for abducting three sisters and forcing them to marry stepbrother Vichitravirya, and section 306 for abetting suicide by one of them (Amba)
Dronacharya: Violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and offence under section 326 for forcing minor Bhil tribal boy Eklavya to sever his thumb
Krishna: Section 366/494/114 for abetting abduction (of Subhadra by the already married Arjuna) and bigamy
Pandu: Section 304A for causing death of sage Kindama (in guise of a deer) by negligence and section 51 of Wildlife Protection Act for killing an animal
Kindama: Section 377 for unnatural/perverted sex with a deer.
Assistant inspector general of Tripura Police Arindam Nath’s novelBridging Minds: A Journey from Mahabharata to Bharata might not rate among the classics. But it relates a few turning points in the epic to the IPC and finds that the Kauravas were harmless compared to the crimes committed by the Pandavas.
Nath tells his story through the diary of protagonist Ashamanja Bhowmik, a medical officer who accompanies the Tripura State Rifles (TSR) during a recruitment rally across the places where Mahabharata was set 3,000 years ago. It also refers to tribal interpretations of the epic, particularly the Bhil version that often tweaks the original.
“The Indian epics fascinate me. But I got the idea of juxtaposing theMahabharata events withpresent-day global politics and looking at the epic’s characters through the IPC prism while travelling across northern and central India as chairman of TSR recruitment board in 2008 and interacting with people. Besides, the growing demand for updating the IPC of 1860 vintage made me take it back in time,” Nath saidfrom Tripura capital Agartala.
The IPC, his book says, would have let Dushasan get away with simple punishment for disrobing Draupadi. The vastraharaneventually led to the Kurukshetra war but outraging modesty of a woman is a bailable offence under section 354 of IPC, Nath’s book contends.
The book finds the infallible Bhishma guilty of abducting three sisters – Amba, Ambika and Ambalika – and forcing them into a bigamous marriage with stepbrother Vichitravirya. Another offence for creating a situation for Amba to commit suicide would have translated into a life sentence.
Guru Dronacharya too would have faced the music under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and section 326 of IPC for forcing a minor tribal boy (Eklavya) to sever his thumb, the book contends while marking the Pandavas as bigger offenders.
In the Jatugriha (house of wax) episode, for instance, they violated sections pertaining to arson, luring a backward Nishad family to die in their place and destroying evidence by killing Duryodhana’s accomplice Purochana. Burning down the Khandavprasta forest too invited death sentence.
Nath infers the Pandavas might have inherited the criminal streak from mother Kunti who would have been jailed for 10 years for violating section 317 IPC by deserting infant Karna.
“In comparison, the Kauravas are offenders of minor crimes such as cattle lifting,” Nath says, arguing that Vidura’s propaganda made the Pandavas more virtuous than they were. “Why then did 59 tribes side with the Kauravas while 38 were with the Pandavas?”
————————————-
Mahabharata protagonists and IPC sections they would have been booked under
Pandavas: Sections 436 (arson), 302 (mass murder of Nishad family with identical composition to died in their place), 201 (hiding/destroying evidence) and 120-B (conspiracy)
Pandavas: Sections 435/436/302/429 for setting Khandavprastha on fire to build their capital, killing thousands of tribes living in that forest, destroying dwellings, crop and flora and fauna
Surya: Section 376 for ‘raping’ Kunti who did not want a child by him
Kunti: Section 317 for deserting child (Karna by Surya) under 12 and exposing him to danger
Bhishma: Sections 366/494 for abducting three sisters and forcing them to marry stepbrother Vichitravirya, and section 306 for abetting suicide by one of them (Amba)
Dronacharya: Violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and offence under section 326 for forcing minor Bhil tribal boy Eklavya to sever his thumb
Krishna: Section 366/494/114 for abetting abduction (of Subhadra by the already married Arjuna) and bigamy
Pandu: Section 304A for causing death of sage Kindama (in guise of a deer) by negligence and section 51 of Wildlife Protection Act for killing an animal
Kindama: Section 377 for unnatural/perverted sex with a deer.
Hon’ble Justice Tripura High Court, Shri Subhasis Talapatra on : Bridging Souls: A Journey from Mahabharata to Bharata
Ek
bodh amader antargato rakter bhitar khela kare ( a
sensibility that plays in within our blood ) as Jibananda Das quietly did his
menagerie of words to define a man in the infinite, ananta.
Mahabharata, unlike other epics of the world occupies a unique epicenter. It is
hardly considered as the literary text by the folks, it is like a text being
read and being told in many different contexts and it has unparalleled
impact on the Indian psyche, it is like a springboard to philosophical
discourse, to ethical polemics. Its temptation to Indian authors appears
irresistible, from Jawaharlal Nehru to Mahasweta Devi and numerous others and
it will go on. This tradition flows transcending the time. To me it is a text
unending, is being written in continuum by readers by their response, by
drawing it forward and ultimately leaving to the posterity. It is an
inalienable component of Indianess, Bharatbarshiyata as
Rabindranath Tagore described our nationalism in Gora.
Mahabharata
, a tale of intrigues , conspiracies, strategies, invasions, passion and of
gory bloodshed is bound for a journey for Nyaya which demands exposition of
truth. Arindam is depicting his saga of this unending epic. "I have
traveled across the length and breadth of India and
I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have
seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do
not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone
of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I
propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for
if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater
than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and
they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation." This
is a statement made in 1835 by none other than Lord Thomas Banington Macauley
whose penal code has been used as the tool by Arindam to interconnect the
crimes of the protagonists as arrayed by Vyas, in the backdrop of a blooming
love. It is like a binary twist , love and violence, while violence is
interpreted as orgy of wild passion and hegemony. Bridging Souls: A
Journey from Mahabharata to Bharata is awe-generating in its idea and weaving
the text. Arindam’s has its niche,a true reader seldom affords to miss such an
invitation for storm over a cup of tea.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




